Saturday, March 17, 2007

Is BAR really this unprofessional? Or am I this clueless?

I must say, up front, that I really enjoy reading Biblical Archeology Review magazine (BAR for short). The variety of articles (especially now that it has combined with its sister publication, Bible Review) has always been valuable. I have shared the magazine with some fellow believers and we all find the material noteworthy, even when the authors' belief systems disagree with our own.

But the March/April 2007 edition had an obvious error that gave me pause as to the level of careful editing BAR receives--or the careful attention to detail that the authors give. Twice, on pages 42 and 45, author Vassilios Tzaferis refers to the fish acrostic icthys as follows:

Ιησουζ Χρισιοζ Θεου Υιοζ Σωτηρ




Do you see what I see? Not only was Χριστος spelled wrong, without the tau, but the final sigmas were replaced with zetas.

I am not a Greek scholar, but I have studied Koine Greek for one whole year (and all the proper Greek scholars can laugh at me now). And while handwritten Greek letters can be difficult to read, especially if you don't know the language, I would have thought the editors would have caught this. (Here, I am giving the benefit of the doubt to Tzaferis, although it is possible he could have gotten this wrong.)

The purpose of ProGeek

For the purposes of pinning down for myself why I am writing and about what I will write, I thought I should put together the purpose of this blog. This blog shall, with the appropriate amounts of humor and seriousness:
  • be a place where I discuss shortcomings and failings of technology as I, in my limited knowledge, see them;
  • be a forum where I shall discuss the light-bulb moments in my walk with Jesus Christ (because he is, as the creator of the universe, the ultimate geek);
  • be a place where I can put down my thoughts about the coming end of the universe (and I don't mean the restaurant);
  • allow me to take my keen eye and intellect (and humility, don't ya know) and apply it to all sorts of situations and point out errors, silliness, and serious shortcomings.
Alas, as I have a great interest in mathematics, there will be math on this blog. It cannot be avoided. And I wouldn't avoid math, even if I had the chance.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

First post

I have thought about starting a blog, and for now I'll just use Blogger. The purpose of this blog is to come later. (Yes, I have thought about it, but I'm not ready to share yet.)

Things in this blog are, for the time being, less certain than they appear.